All Apple news

The buyer defective iPhone 6 in Orenburg sued “Coherent” almost 110 thousand rubles

The Central court of Orenburg partially satisfied the claim to “Them” about collecting of cost of poor quality iPhone, as well as fines, penalties and compensation for moral damages. It is reported by RIA56 with reference to the Central district court.

In October 2015 the inhabitant of Orenburg purchased iPhone 6 cost 50 990 rubles. Soon after buying the gadget noticed that the purchase has a defect: detachment of the touch panel from the case. In February 2016, the buyer sent to the salon of cellular communication the claim in response to which he was advised to contact the service center and refused to accept the phone.

To terminate the contract and return the money, Orenburg had to go to court. The court ordered a technical examination, which confirmed the presence of device manufacturing defect: a loose attachment of the display to the body as a result of using defective parts during Assembly.

“The salon was ordered to compensate the cost of the phone $ 50 for 990 rubles, and 1000 rubles as compensation of moral harm, the penalty of 25 495 rubles, and a penalty of 30 000 rubles”, – said in the Central district court.

This is not the first case of the return of the defective iPhone to the seller through the courts. In January 2014 years ago the inhabitant of Krasnoyarsk has seized “Coherent” 90 000 rubles for a defective iPhone 4s. In March of the same year, the court decided “Euroset” to pay 95 000 rubles to the resident of Volgograd, who bought a broken iPhone 4s. In November, the court sought more than 147 000 roubles, an unscrupulous seller of the iPhone in favor of the buyer. At the end of 2015, the inhabitant of Ekaterinburg has managed to sue the money for the Apple iPhone 6, which three months later started hanging out and off.

Read also:   iPhone 6s confirmed its superiority over Samsung Galaxy S7 edge in speed test

In all cases, the court decided to terminate the contract of sale and recover from retailers in favor of the plaintiffs the amount spent on purchase of phones, as well as a penalty, compensation of moral harm, the penalty, the cost of examination and payment of legal services.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *